General case
One principal, one agent.
Pricipal offers agent a take-it-or-leave-it contract, no bargaining
Pareto efficient contract:
Suppose contract has two conponents, efforts and payoffs.
We start by assuming some level of effort, let it be efficient
FOC:
By rearranging,
We know that
If there are only two plausible results (contingencies), (1) becomes:
Or
The ratio of two marginal utilities for outcomes 1 and
Then we can analyze three cases:
Principal is risk neutral,
This means that in order for :
it has to be that
Agent receives a payment independent of the result (same in both outcomes; complete insurance). In this case, principal takes responsibility of all the risks.
Principal is risk averse,
Then we have
which means that principal's profit has to be independent of the result, or:
Optimal contract is a franchise contract
这个意味着Principal保留的钱在不同状态是一样的。这种情况下 agent承担了全部风险。
Suppose both of them are risk averse
Rewrite (FOCs) as:
Differentiate w.r.t.
Factoring out
which can be rewritten using the definition of the coefficient of absolute risk aversion: